Emory Decision-Making
MegalabPropose a Session
Menu

EDM Megalab · Article queue

What should we read next?

Suggest a paper for a future discussion. Coordinators can turn a short list into a poll for an upcoming meeting.

Member queue · Loading live articles…

Member access
Sign in with your Emory email.

Suggest articles or vote using a secure email link—no password needed.

Coordinator console

The queue

On the EDM Megalab radar.

Articles proposed for discussion appear here. We will add queued papers to a poll when we have an open slot.

01
Psychopathology

Compulsivity is linked to suboptimal choice variability but unaltered reinforcement learning under uncertainty

Lee, Rouault & Wyart · Nature Mental Health · 2025

A clean computational-psychiatry example that separates variability in learning from variability in choice.

↗
02
Reinforcement learning

Schemas, reinforcement learning and the medial prefrontal cortex

Bein & Niv · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · 2025

An integrative treatment of schemas, latent states, reinforcement learning, memory, and medial prefrontal function.

↗
03
Value

A neural mechanism for conserved value computations integrating information and rewards

Bromberg-Martin et al. · Nature Neuroscience · 2024

A cross-species account of information value, reward, uncertainty, exploration, and lateral habenula.

↗
04
Reinforcement learning

Distributional reinforcement learning in prefrontal cortex

Multiple authors · Nature Neuroscience · 2024

An entry point into richer representations of outcome distributions, risk-sensitive behavior, and individual differences.

↗

How it works

  1. 01

    Suggest

    Sign in with an Emory email and share the citation, link, and rationale.

  2. 02

    Curate

    A coordinator reviews new suggestions, places promising papers in the public queue, and selects a short poll slate.

  3. 03

    Vote

    Members vote for up to three papers they would genuinely like to discuss. The database enforces the limit for every ballot.

  4. 04

    Schedule

    Organizers use the result alongside timing, thematic balance, and discussion-leader availability—not vote count alone.